An article
recently appeared in TheJuilliard Journal written by one of our
doctoral students, Benjamin Laude, addressing Palestinian-Israeli issues. I
read the article before it was published and, although I did not agree with
some of his points, I believed it warranted appearing in TheJournal.
As I expected,
there were many responses to the article, both pro and con. What I did not
expect were several responses from readers who were bothered by the fact that a
political subject was being addressed in a performing-arts college publication.
It seems that some of our readers believe that young artists should not have a
voice in a debate that has sadly endured for decades.
One alumna said
that she did not “expect to read someone’s opinion about the Israeli-Palestinian
situation [in TheJournal]. . . . Please, let The Journal be about music, dance, and
drama, the subjects in which The Juilliard School excels.” Another writer put
his thoughts more bluntly, stating, “Who do you think you are, the University
of Chicago?”
The arts have
often been relegated to a second tier in our educational system, portrayed as a
“soft discipline” compared with the “hard sciences” and other subjects that
supposedly require more intellectual rigor. One need only examine the way our
primary and secondary schools are evaluated on the state and federal levels to
realize that artistic ability, and with it imagination and creativity, have
literally no place in the data collection process.
But if we are to
believe that the arts are an important and integral part of our society, should
not artists have the opportunity to participate in a debate that involves one
of the most serious issues of our day? Implicit in the criticism of artists
expressing non-artistic opinions is the perception that they do not have the
intellectual capacity or education to delve into such topics. Yet, as one
follows the logic of one reader mentioned above, an undergraduate at the
University of Chicago has the right to write on any topic because that student
has a level of intellectual credibility not bestowed upon a young artist.
TheJournal’s student
opinion column (“Voice Box”) was created quite a few years ago to give our
students a chance to express themselves on a wide variety of topics, ranging
from the performing arts to local and world politics. It has always been my
hope that Juilliard students would feel a responsibility to be knowledgeable
about their world and to become leaders in whatever profession they would
choose after graduation.
Obviously, artists
live in the same world as individuals in other walks of life. We all have a
responsibility to develop informed opinions about politics, economics,
literature, sports, cinema, etc.; that is what a full life is all about. From
my perspective, it is essential that Juilliard students immerse themselves in
the issues that shape the world beyond the stage. Although we may not agree
with some of the opinions or conclusions expressed by our students, we should
celebrate their commitment to being active citizens in a nation and a world
that also desperately need their artistic sensitivities.
Joseph W. Polisi became the sixth president of The Juilliard School in 1984.