Confessions of Scholastic Distinction
by LANCE HORNE
It isn’t every year that artists are given license to work on
an independent project of their choosing under the aegis of an institution.
Well, actually, it is at Juilliard—thanks to a few progressive
minds on the administrative second floor. A new program gives undergraduates
the opportunity to spend their senior year engaged in such an undertaking,
allowing those students who successfully complete their project
to graduate with Scholastic Distinction.
I underwent the process in its inaugural year, graduating with
the Class of 2000 alongside two other seniors who had survived the
15 months of meetings, proposals, counterproposals, and other necessary
growing pains, while managing to keep their dedication to the project
in the foreground. In its first year, this process was somewhat
bumpy as students and faculty alike participated in fleshing out
the Scholastic Distinction Program’s ambitions and opened the lines
of communication.
The idea is actually quite simple. Interested juniors contact
Bärli Nugent at extension 592 for further information, and submit
a proposal for consideration. The Scholastic Distinction Committee—headed
by the dean and comprised of choice faculty and administration—reviews
the applicants and their proposals. Applicants are encouraged to
find a Juilliard faculty member to serve as an advisor to their
project (and a liaison to the committee on the project’s behalf,
should the need arise). The committee meets with candidates and
selects a handful of students they feel are up to the challenge.
Throughout their senior year, participants meet with their advisors
and present their progress to the committee regularly, completing
the project in the spring of the senior year. Two bits of advice:
do not procrastinate, and leave plenty of time for revisions.
Committees are good at having opinions, and their suggestions for
revisions need to be taken into account (alongside those of your
advisor). Also (and here comes the confession in the guise of an
instruction), if you play the game, be sure to follow the rules.
If your project has a written portion (and most do), be sure to
familiarize yourself early on with how it should be formatted. This
should allow you to spend your final revision time tightening your
thoughts—not changing from parenthetical documentation to footnotes.
As for choosing a subject, proposals will surely reflect the diverse
interests of our student body. My particular project focused on
the relation of text and music as a progression in American musical
theater in the late 20th century. Other projects have explored body
kinesthetics and education, captured the elusive nature of serialism,
and delved into Schubert. The possibilities are endless… and I know
that this year’s batch of juniors have plenty of exciting ideas
that might push the envelope.
It is a recurring theme that the best Juilliard students often
start to feel the constraints of the conservatory environment by
their senior year. The Scholastic Distinction program gives a healthy
outlet to such students, while providing them the best guidance
Juilliard has to offer.
Recognizing that students feel overloaded, the program also gives
seniors a little room for air by allotting academic credit. The
Scholastic Distinction Project is undertaken in lieu of a required
academic class in the senior year. Depending on the nature of the
proposal, the committee rewards credits for the senior music history
or humanities electives, or some combination thereof.
With the program now in place, there is only one more vital ingredient
needed to make next year’s program a success: your imagination.
So, take advantage of this opportunity to make next year one of
artistic—and scholastic—distinction.
Lance Horne is a master’s student in composition.
|